Magellan and his cross

2008
11.10
Magellan's Cross, believed to be miraculous, is nothing but a deceptive tool to conquer the unsuspecting ancient Cebuanos.

Magellan's Cross, believed to be miraculous, is nothing but a deceptive tool to conquer the unsuspecting ancient Cebuanos.

I find it disturbing how some history textbooks tell us that the Philippines was “discovered” by Spanish-hired Portuguese explorer Ferdinand Magellan in 1521. Wow Philippines has even repeated the same confusing remark when describing the island of Limasawa as a birthplace of Christianity in the Philippines. I question the use of the word “discovered” because hundreds of years before these Spanish/Portuguese explorations, the islands have long been inhabited by its natives. In fact, Mactan Island’s chief Lapu-Lapu was already there when Magellan and his team arrived.

The word Christianization also does bother me. Spain that time was using God as a scare tactic to conquer and manipulate inhabitants in the east. What the Spaniards had really brought us was an idolotrous religion that subsisted on the sweat and blood of those they have conquered. Where is Christianity there? Not even a trace.

The house built for the ancient cross

The house built for the ancient cross

Just across the present Cebu City Hall is Magellan’s Shrine that houses the Cross of Magellan. The original cross, believed to be encased in Tindalo wood, was made a symbol of Cebu and local government seal when it is nothing but an ugly reminder of how our own gullibility made us Spanish captives for 333 years. Lapu-Lapu, probably one of the brightest minds of his time, refused this religious crap from gaining a foothold. We all know how this brave warrior made a faucet out of the Spaniard’s body. Our historians may have named a small city after him, but Magellan’s cross was made a symbol of the province the Mactan chieftain so tried to defend. Call that irony.

bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark

See related posts:

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

One Response to “Magellan and his cross”

  1. Vicente Calibo de Jesus says:

    “Discover”

    You’re right. The word “discover” to describe the arrival of Magellan and his fleet in the archipelago is not appropriate. It is ethnocentric and reflects Western egotism. Most exploration/navigation historians agree with you. Instead of “discover” they now simply write Magellan “reached”, or “arrived”, or “came”, and some such words.

    Vicente Calibo de Jesus

Your Reply

CommentLuv Enabled